A vision for policy education in science

Bertrand J. Neyhouse*

Edited by Jennifer Cascino, Steven Cheng, Sarah Radway, Laura Shupp, and Anuraag Singh

Editor’s Note | Aug. 31 2023

*Email: neyhouse@mit.edu

DOI: 10.38105/spr.8cy9g9msd0


  • With the publication of Volume IV, the Review continues to address key challenges at the intersection of science, technology, and policy
  • Consideration of policy issues can deepen motivation and context for scientific research
  • I encourage scientists to actively engage with policymakers and policy research

Article Summary

Volume IV of the MIT Science Policy Review addresses crucial challenges facing our society, providing insightful discussions around potential solutions. In this short note, I share how engagement with science, technology, and policy has shaped my philosophy as a scientist and discuss what role the Review might play in educating scientists on policy matters concerning their work.

Open Access


This MIT Science Policy Review article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/.

Bertrand Neyhouse

Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Editor-in-Chief, MIT Science Policy Review, Cambridge, MA